case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Small fees implement.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only accomplished In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
The official court record is maintained because of the court of record. Copies of case file documents usually are not available around the search site and will need to be ordered from the court of record.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to of your boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Safe and sound with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had nothing at all to fret about.
Because of this, simply citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling another person to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live lawful object case study in this kind of-and-such community, without actually offering them an address. Driving across the community endeavoring to find their phone is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s really worth.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report to the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
The legislation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called law of necessity..
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. If the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety times with the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
Statutory laws are Those people created by legislative bodies, like Congress at both the federal and state levels. Although this style of law strives to condition our society, offering rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
8. For your reasons stated previously mentioned, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend from the comments, and their request is So acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, it is also a very well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.